When building large-scale applications—especially web-based or front-end-heavy ones—TypeScript provides several critical advantages over Python, making it a strong choice for engineering teams that prioritize maintainability, scalability, and performance.
TypeScript’s optional static typing allows developers to define and enforce types at compile time. This helps catch bugs early and makes code easier to understand and refactor. In contrast, Python’s dynamic typing, while flexible, can lead to runtime errors that only show up after deployment.
Because of its rich type system, TypeScript offers superior integration with modern IDEs like VS Code. Features like intelligent autocompletion, inline documentation, and real-time error checking significantly boost developer productivity—something Python lacks without additional configuration.
TypeScript was built to work seamlessly with JavaScript and the modern front-end ecosystem. It is commonly used with frameworks like Angular, React, and Vue. Python, on the other hand, is mostly used for back-end development, scripting, and data science—not front-end-heavy applications.
TypeScript encourages a modular, object-oriented architecture that is easier to scale across large teams and codebases. Interfaces, abstract classes, and strict typing rules make onboarding new developers easier and prevent technical debt from accumulating.
Interface-based design ensures consistency
Code can be organized into reusable modules
Great for long-term maintenance and onboarding new developers
Large organizations like Google, Microsoft, and Slack use TypeScript for building complex front-end applications. Its adoption has grown rapidly, making it easier to hire developers, find resources, and integrate third-party tools. TypeScript is the default language for major frameworks like Angular and is heavily used with React, Vue, and Next.js. This makes it ideal for:
Full-stack JavaScript applications
Single Page Applications (SPAs)
Complex UI components
Python lacks this level of front-end integration, making it less ideal for web interfaces.
TypeScript supports thousands of type definitions via DefinitelyTyped, allowing for better interoperability with popular JavaScript libraries without sacrificing type safety.
With growing adoption among major tech companies, TypeScript has a vast ecosystem of types, libraries, and documentation. This includes type definitions for most popular JavaScript packages, reducing integration issues.
In contrast, Python, while great for scripting, AI, and data analysis, can become difficult to manage in larger codebases due to its dynamic typing and less structured nature.
While Python is a great choice for AI, data science, and rapid prototyping, TypeScript is often the better choice for applications that require maintainability, performance, and a robust front-end experience.
Dejan Velimirovic
Full-Stack Software Developer
Previously at
Ivan Janjić
Fullstack Developer
Aleksandar Orelj
Full-Stack Developer
Previously at
Luka Patarcic
Technical Lead
Previously at
Branislav Totic
Fullstack Developer
Previously at
Emir Salihović
Fullstack Developer
Aleksa Stevic
Full-Stack Developer
Previously at
Milena Brankovic
Fullstack Developer
Previously at
Vanja Culum
Fullstack Developer
Previously at
Andrija Djuric
Fullstack Developer
Previously at
Previously at
Darko Simic
Fullstack Developer
Previously at
Lana Ilic
Fullstack Developer
Previously at
Ivana Jovic
Frontend Developer
Previously at
Our work-proven TypeScript developers are ready to join your remote team today. Choose the one that fits your needs and start a 30-day trial.